Double Gun Journal

NO ITEMS MAY BE POSTED FOR SALE ON THIS FORUM or direct references to items for sale. This includes, but is not limited to, the following: A personal item that’s obviously for sale or would appear to be for sale; or if a link is posted to some other site where the item is for sale. Please note that references to items posted elsewhere are ok for discussion as long as a direct link is not included. Any "Wanted to Buy" posts are not allowed and will be removed. The moderators will delete any posts that are deemed offensive, abusive or slanderous in nature. Commercial operations or businesses may not advertise nor appear to advertise their products or services, either directly, or indirectly by a second party, except for simple reference as a source for such products or services
Post Reply
User avatar
Fin2Feather
Posts: 1111
Joined: Sun Jan 07, 2007 10:15 am
Location: Kansas High Plains
Has thanked: 329 times
Been thanked: 319 times

Double Gun Journal

Post by Fin2Feather »

Craig,

Great article on the Super Fox in the new DGJ. Well written and photographed, and very informative. Congrats and thanks!
Utica Fox Appreciation Society - Charter Member
djs
Posts: 3
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2011 10:14 pm

Re: Double Gun Journal

Post by djs »

Here's my question. Saw the DGJ article, but also some others describing the Win 21 as first gun in 20G with 3" chambers, and not until the 1950s (Randy Wakeman was source). Didn't Super Fox 20G have 3" chambers? If not, why bother with a 20G Super Fox?
Researcher
Posts: 6256
Joined: Sun Jan 07, 2007 7:18 pm
Location: WA/AK
Has thanked: 487 times
Been thanked: 2500 times

Re: Double Gun Journal

Post by Researcher »

Very few of the Super-Fox 20-gauge guns were ordered chambered for 3-inch shells. I have found 15 times as many graded regular frame 20-gauge Ansley H. Fox doubles ordered chambered for long shells than the 20-gauge Super-Fox. Remember, the factory offered 2 3/4, 2 7/8 and 3-inch 20-gauge shells for the first quarter of the 20th Century carried a load of 2 1/2 drams of bulk smokeless powder or 20 grains of dense smokeless powder, such as Ballistite, and 7/8 ounce of shot. The 2 1/2 inch 20-gauge shells were offered with 2 1/4 drams of bulk or up to 18 grains of dense smokeless powders and 7/8 ounce of shot. The longer shells offered a bit higher velocity, and more/better wadding for a better gas seal.

By the mid-1920s, Peters Cartridge Co. did offer their progressive burning powder High Velocity one ounce 20-gauge loads at extra cost in a 2 7/8 or 3-inch case, but the load was no heavier than the 2 3/4 inch Peters High Velocity. I don't find Western Cartridge Co. offering their Super-X 20-gauge shell in a long case or Remington Arms Co., Inc., offering their Nitro Express 20-gauge loads in longer cases. Both just came in a 2 3/4 inch case.

The Winchester Model 21 20-gauge Magnum was the first catalogued gun for the modern 3-inch Magnum 20-gauge shell. The 3-inch Magnum 20-gauge was a post WW-II item. The first commercial listing for a 3-inch Magnum 20-gauge was the Magnum Model 21 in the January 2, 1954 Winchester catalogue. However, there are no 3-inch 20-gauge shells listed in the January 2, 1954 Winchester Ammunition catalogue and price list!?! The Olin brothers and their buddies had been playing around with 3-inch 20-gauge Model 21s for some time before that. In the 1955 Winchester ammunition catalogue the 20-gauge 3-inch Magnum shell is offered with 1 1/8 ounce of Lubaloy #6 or 1 3/16 ounce of Lubaloy #4. That year the 2 3/4 inch Magnum shells were introduced with the 1 1/2 ounce in 12-gauge, 1 1/4 ounce in 16-gauge and 1 1/8 ounce in 20-gauge. The 3-inch 20-gauge Magnum offerings remained the same through the 1959 price list. For 1960 the 3-inch 20-gauge Magnum with 1 1/4 ounce of chilled shot was added to the offerings, while the Lubaloy loads were still 1 1/8 and 1 3/16. The Winchester/Western offerings in 3-inch 20-gauge shells remained the same thru 1968 where my old catalogues play out.
Share the knowledge
djs
Posts: 3
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2011 10:14 pm

Re: Double Gun Journal

Post by djs »

Thanks for the info! You are saying that 3" chambered "standard guns " were made? Were they capable to handle the pressure of the later magnum loads? Were there commercial contemporary 3" loads for the earlier Foxes, or only hand loads?
Researcher
Posts: 6256
Joined: Sun Jan 07, 2007 7:18 pm
Location: WA/AK
Has thanked: 487 times
Been thanked: 2500 times

Re: Double Gun Journal

Post by Researcher »

The North American ammunition manufacturers offered all manner of longer shells for the first quarter of the 20th Century. The longer shells didn't carry a heavier load than one could get in the 2 3/4 inch shell, just more/better wadding, which many gun cranks believed to be important --

Image

Image

Image
Share the knowledge
djs
Posts: 3
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2011 10:14 pm

Re: Double Gun Journal

Post by djs »

"have found 15 times as many graded regular frame 20-gauge Ansley H. Fox doubles ordered chambered for long shells than the 20-gauge Super Fox..."
With that being said, assuming one found a 3" chambered, 20G non Super Fox, would the gun be able to accommodate modern 3" magnums? I imagine the Super Fox could handle current loads easily, just because of the beefier barrel size.
User avatar
Foxnut
Posts: 2334
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 11:53 pm
Location: Western, MI
Has thanked: 1541 times
Been thanked: 1626 times

Re: Double Gun Journal

Post by Foxnut »

Craig,
Great article and some screaming pics. Well done! Brett
Regards - Foxnut
loggy
Posts: 1116
Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2007 1:33 pm
Location: idaho
Has thanked: 412 times
Been thanked: 248 times

Re: Double Gun Journal

Post by loggy »

The DGJ finally made it to my mail box today. My wife thought i was getting cranky when the mailman kept leaving an empty mail box. The Super Fox article was very well done. Lots of new information. You have certainly found some very nice examples for you collection. Thanks again for your efforts. John
jolly bill
Posts: 1517
Joined: Sun Jan 21, 2007 10:06 pm
Location: Western NY
Has thanked: 1261 times
Been thanked: 430 times

Re: Double Gun Journal

Post by jolly bill »

Craig,

Very nice job indeed on the article and the pictures.

Great to see some nice Fox material in the DGJ again.

Jolly
Researcher
Posts: 6256
Joined: Sun Jan 07, 2007 7:18 pm
Location: WA/AK
Has thanked: 487 times
Been thanked: 2500 times

Re: Double Gun Journal

Post by Researcher »

With that being said, assuming one found a 3" chambered, 20G non Super Fox, would the gun be able to accommodate modern 3" magnums? I imagine the Super Fox could handle current loads easily, just because of the beefier barrel size
I wouldn't be touching off modern 3-inch Magnum 20-gauge shells in some of the 20-gauge guns I've found in the records ordered with 3-inch chambers, some of which weighed less than six pounds. The SAAMI specs for all 20-gauge shells is a max average pressure of 12000 psi.
Share the knowledge
Post Reply