My First Fox

NO ITEMS MAY BE POSTED FOR SALE ON THIS FORUM or direct references to items for sale. This includes, but is not limited to, the following: A personal item that’s obviously for sale or would appear to be for sale; or if a link is posted to some other site where the item is for sale. Please note that references to items posted elsewhere are ok for discussion as long as a direct link is not included. Any "Wanted to Buy" posts are not allowed and will be removed. The moderators will delete any posts that are deemed offensive, abusive or slanderous in nature. Commercial operations or businesses may not advertise nor appear to advertise their products or services, either directly, or indirectly by a second party, except for simple reference as a source for such products or services
Post Reply
Canuck
Posts: 7
Joined: Sat Feb 15, 2025 10:37 pm
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 13 times

My First Fox

Post by Canuck »

Just picked up my first Fox. A 1923 H Super Fox, 3" chambers with 28" barrels(shortened by a previous owner from the 30" it was ordered with). I realize the collector value isn't there with the barrels being shortened but I am a shooter not a collector and this gun will serve my purpose well for waterfowling over decoys. Plus at 1/4 the price of a collector gun and in Canadian $ no less it makes me very happy to find this to hunt with. Lying next to my NID4E this thing is a beast! It makes my NID look like a 20ga! :lol:
Attachments
IMG_8803.jpeg
IMG_8813.jpeg
IMG_8812.jpeg
IMG_8808.jpeg
IMG_8806.jpeg
User avatar
Silvers
Posts: 4951
Joined: Sat Jan 06, 2007 9:28 pm
Location: Between Phila and Utica
Has thanked: 989 times
Been thanked: 1447 times

Re: My First Fox

Post by Silvers »

Congrats on your Super. Many of the members who make time to reply here have already done that to your similar post on the Parker site. As a long time student of Supers I ask about your 3 inch chambers. Are the barrel flats stamped exactly 3 IN. which is the righteous Fox stamp? If not it was probably rechambered post factory. A good close up pic of the barrel flat stamping would be helpful if you will post one. Thank you.

Also it looks like the top rib (second pic) has two plugged screw holes where a sighting gizmo was once attached. Not that common but I’ve seen a few Supers with similar mounting holes. frank
Aan
User avatar
Jeff S
Posts: 3342
Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2015 10:59 am
Location: Grand Rapids, Michigan
Has thanked: 2102 times
Been thanked: 1451 times

Re: My First Fox

Post by Jeff S »

Congratulations Canuck. You’ll have fun duck hunting with that Super. Please post some hunting pictures once you get out in the marsh.
Shoot vintage firearms, relax, and have fun.
Canuck
Posts: 7
Joined: Sat Feb 15, 2025 10:37 pm
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 13 times

Re: My First Fox

Post by Canuck »

Silvers wrote: Tue Sep 23, 2025 8:24 pm Congrats on your Super. Many of the members who make time to reply here have already done that to your similar post on the Parker site. As a long time student of Supers I ask about your 3 inch chambers. Are the barrel flats stamped exactly 3 IN. which is the righteous Fox stamp? If not it was probably rechambered post factory. A good close up pic of the barrel flat stamping would be helpful if you will post one. Thank you.

Also it looks like the top rib (second pic) has two plugged screw holes where a sighting gizmo was once attached. Not that common but I’ve seen a few Supers with similar mounting holes. frank
Attachments
IMG_8775.jpeg
IMG_8774.jpeg
IMG_8902.jpeg
Canuck
Posts: 7
Joined: Sat Feb 15, 2025 10:37 pm
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 13 times

Re: My First Fox

Post by Canuck »

Jeff S wrote: Tue Sep 23, 2025 9:18 pm Congratulations Canuck. You’ll have fun duck hunting with that Super. Please post some hunting pictures once you get out in the marsh.
I'll be chasing geese with it Thursday morning on a harvested pea field. Will keep you posted!
User avatar
Jeff S
Posts: 3342
Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2015 10:59 am
Location: Grand Rapids, Michigan
Has thanked: 2102 times
Been thanked: 1451 times

Re: My First Fox

Post by Jeff S »

Canuck wrote: Wed Sep 24, 2025 5:29 am
Jeff S wrote: Tue Sep 23, 2025 9:18 pm Congratulations Canuck. You’ll have fun duck hunting with that Super. Please post some hunting pictures once you get out in the marsh.
I'll be chasing geese with it Thursday morning on a harvested pea field. Will keep you posted!
I don’t know what you’ll be using, but I really like the Kent “waterfowl” bismuth, 2 3/4” #4’s for ducks.
Shoot vintage firearms, relax, and have fun.
Foxnut
Posts: 1857
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 11:53 pm
Location: Western, MI
Has thanked: 1000 times
Been thanked: 1056 times

Re: My First Fox

Post by Foxnut »

Canuck,
Congrats on your new Super! Looks like it will be a fun gun that will get used which is great! Good luck Thursday and let us know how she performs. Have you measured the chokes/constriction? Even w/2” cut I’m assuming you’ve got some decent choke left. Post pics of Thursday’s shoot
Regards - Foxnut
User avatar
Silvers
Posts: 4951
Joined: Sat Jan 06, 2007 9:28 pm
Location: Between Phila and Utica
Has thanked: 989 times
Been thanked: 1447 times

Re: My First Fox

Post by Silvers »

Canuck, the barrel flat pic isn't the best and even though I expanded it I don't see the 3 IN. stamp. Your Super is so early that progressive 3-inch shells/chambers hadn't been perfected and it was most likely made with tight chambers for 2-3/4" progressive shells like Super-X's. That can be problematic insofar as ejection if not properly rechambered for 3-inch shells especially when using modern plastics.

On the Parker site you wrote that the ejector rods were removed. I answered your first post there while assuming it was the ejector stems you were referring to. However on these new pics I see the ejector stems and ejector mechanism are intact and what I call the ejector guide pins are missing. Both of them. If this were my Super I would not be shooting it for fear of breaking a stem due to lack of outboard support of its ejector face. It's a simple fix to replace the guide pins as long as the pins are not broken off and lodged in their matching blind holes in the barrel. frank
Aan
Canuck
Posts: 7
Joined: Sat Feb 15, 2025 10:37 pm
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 13 times

Re: My First Fox

Post by Canuck »

Silvers wrote: Wed Sep 24, 2025 7:51 am Canuck, the barrel flat pic isn't the best and even though I expanded it I don't see the 3 IN. stamp. Your Super is so early that progressive 3-inch shells/chambers hadn't been perfected and it was most likely made with tight chambers for 2-3/4" progressive shells like Super-X's. That can be problematic insofar as ejection if not properly rechambered for 3-inch shells especially when using modern plastics.

On the Parker site you wrote that the ejector rods were removed. I answered your first post there while assuming it was the ejector stems you were referring to. However on these new pics I see the ejector stems and ejector mechanism are intact and what I call the ejector guide pins are missing. Both of them. If this were my Super I would not be shooting it for fear of breaking a stem due to lack of outboard support of its ejector face. It's a simple fix to replace the guide pins as long as the pins are not broken off and lodged in their matching blind holes in the barrel. frank
Ok thanks for that info. I pulled the barrels off to have a look at what you are referring to. Both guide pins are broken off inside the barrels. I'll get it sent off to Chris Dawe to see if he can repair it.
Frank
Last edited by Canuck on Wed Sep 24, 2025 1:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Canuck
Posts: 7
Joined: Sat Feb 15, 2025 10:37 pm
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 13 times

Re: My First Fox

Post by Canuck »

Jeff S wrote: Wed Sep 24, 2025 7:46 am
Canuck wrote: Wed Sep 24, 2025 5:29 am
Jeff S wrote: Tue Sep 23, 2025 9:18 pm Congratulations Canuck. You’ll have fun duck hunting with that Super. Please post some hunting pictures once you get out in the marsh.
I'll be chasing geese with it Thursday morning on a harvested pea field. Will keep you posted!
I don’t know what you’ll be using, but I really like the Kent “waterfowl” bismuth, 2 3/4” #4’s for ducks.
I have a case of that Kent bismuth but was worried it may be a little too high pressure for the old guns. I was given 51-10rd boxes of the green box Bismuth No-Tox ammo by Eley from when Bismuth was first introduced. I have both 2.5" and 2 3/4" in 1oz to 1 1/4oz that my old guns really seem to shoot well with.
DarylC
Posts: 1317
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 11:04 am
Location: People's Republic of Maryland
Has thanked: 1565 times
Been thanked: 492 times

Re: My First Fox

Post by DarylC »

Those bismuth rounds from Eley should be fine.
Owning a Fox is not a spectator sport.
Post Reply