Is there any negative to having a Sterlingworth with extractors? Is it one more thing to worry about breaking? I will be using the gun in the field.
Thanks.
purchasing my first Sterlingworth..question about extractors
-
Researcher
- Posts: 6256
- Joined: Sun Jan 07, 2007 7:18 pm
- Location: WA/AK
- Has thanked: 487 times
- Been thanked: 2500 times
-
Stan Hillis
- Posts: 2827
- Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 8:31 pm
- Location: Jawja
- Has thanked: 883 times
- Been thanked: 1002 times
I'll be the first to defer to Dave as far as the reliability of Fox ejectors, and overall knowledge of Foxes in general. He has been shooting them (Foxes) for about 30 some years longer than I. But, having two Foxes with ejectors and two with extractors, I far prefer the ejectors for game shooting. The arguments for extractors are strong, especially for those hunters who wander as they hunt, i.e. grouse, pheasant, quail. Not having to look for empties on the ground in weeds is a big plus. But, most of my game shooting is done either in a blind or on a stand where I only move around a little. A hot dove shoot, or a lengthy covey rise on quail, begs ejectors to me. I have owned my extractor SW longer than any other Fox, and shot it exclusively on doves one entire season. Though I thoroughly enjoyed shooting it that season, I worked over my finger (and thumb)nails pretty good on a couple of hot shoots.
Given a choice of two guns exactly the same I'd buy the one with ejectors, knowing I'd pay a premium for them. That said, I'll never pass up a very nice double that I really like otherwise just because it doesn't have ejectors. Hope you enjoy the SW, they handle good.
Stan
Given a choice of two guns exactly the same I'd buy the one with ejectors, knowing I'd pay a premium for them. That said, I'll never pass up a very nice double that I really like otherwise just because it doesn't have ejectors. Hope you enjoy the SW, they handle good.
Stan
-
mc15426378
- Posts: 739
- Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2008 11:23 pm
- Location: Mississippi