Reproof fails

Post your questions or seek advise regarding gunsmithing, restoration, repairs, ballistics, etc, etc.
Commercial operations or businesses may not advertise nor appear to advertise their products or services, either directly, or indirectly by a second party, except for simple reference as a source for such products or services
Post Reply
mark beasland
Posts: 57
Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2007 6:22 pm
Location: Wisconsin
Been thanked: 1 time
Contact:

Reproof fails

Post by mark beasland »

I understand that at some point Fox routinely lengthen and reproofed short chambered guns sent in for service. Is there any record on how many if any failed the reproof?
vaturkey
Posts: 3153
Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2008 6:33 pm
Location: Hamilton, VA
Has thanked: 617 times
Been thanked: 965 times

Re: Reproof fails

Post by vaturkey »

Morning Mark,
As I recall, guns that were sent in for work during the later Savage years were routinely extended with longer chambers and stamped as such on the barrels (ugly stamping at that). If the gun was determined not to have the required wall thickness for extension, the owner was given the option of purchased new barrels from Savage at dealer cost for fitting to their guns. I believe if the owner didn't want to pay for new barrels, the gun in its original condition was returned back to them (that's the part I'm a fuzzy on). Now, whether they failed proof or failed pre-proof measurements is another question indeed.

PS. I'm doing this from memory. I'm guessing Frank, or some of the others members with much deeper knowledge of the process will correct me if I'm incorrect. I'm pretty used to being corrected. :)
Post Reply