Serial numbers, 'lifespan' of Fox business, etc.

NO ITEMS MAY BE POSTED FOR SALE ON THIS FORUM or direct references to items for sale. This includes, but is not limited to, the following: A personal item that’s obviously for sale or would appear to be for sale; or if a link is posted to some other site where the item is for sale. Please note that references to items posted elsewhere are ok for discussion as long as a direct link is not included. Any "Wanted to Buy" posts are not allowed and will be removed. The moderators will delete any posts that are deemed offensive, abusive or slanderous in nature. Commercial operations or businesses may not advertise nor appear to advertise their products or services, either directly, or indirectly by a second party, except for simple reference as a source for such products or services
Post Reply
orpington
Posts: 27
Joined: Fri Nov 21, 2014 5:54 pm
Been thanked: 8 times

Serial numbers, 'lifespan' of Fox business, etc.

Post by orpington »

I have often wondered if the businessmen that produced firearms in Philadelphia (this would have mostly been after Ansley Fox's tenure) planned on being there, or really, producing Fox shotguns for only a few generations. Maybe they saw only a limited market over a somewhat limited time frame? That is, based on the serial numbering, if 12 ga Sterlingworth's began at 50,000, they predicted that well under 50,000 graded 12 ga firearms would be produced. Likewise, with graded 20 ga firearms beginning at 200,000, it means that they predicted producing well under 150,000 12 ga Sterlingworth's. Likewise, with 20 ga Sterlingworth's beginning at 250,000, and 16 ga graded guns beginning at 300,000 and 16 ga Sterleingworths beginning at 350,000. Obviously, their foresight proved true, and they obviously predicted producing more 12 ga Sterlingworth's than anything else. Was the obsolescence 'planned' after only a few generations? Or, what was the 'plan' as far as numbering goes, if the allotted numbers in a series were exceeded?
Mike of the Mountain
Posts: 1976
Joined: Thu Aug 08, 2013 4:16 pm
Location: Springville, PA
Has thanked: 94 times
Been thanked: 121 times
Contact:

Re: Serial numbers, 'lifespan' of Fox business, etc.

Post by Mike of the Mountain »

My guess, and it is only a guess, is that the time it took to hand craft each gun led into their decision on where to begin the serial numbering. That and the economics of the times would dictate. There were other depressions/recessions before the big crash that would have affected what cash could be spent on a custom gun and on a "production" gun such as the SW.
Researcher
Posts: 6256
Joined: Sun Jan 07, 2007 7:18 pm
Location: WA/AK
Has thanked: 487 times
Been thanked: 2500 times

Re: Serial numbers, 'lifespan' of Fox business, etc.

Post by Researcher »

I'm sure if they reached graded 12-gauge serial number 49999, they would have figured something out. Maybe they'd have gone back and used 3001 to 7000 that they appear to have skipped!!
I've felt for some time that the Godshalks, for sure by about 1925, saw that their profits were in their automobile accessories and other light industrial items, not in expensive to produce shotguns with a limited market. I've always wondered what Ansley was thinking to go out and found two companies to build double barrel shotguns, after he'd spent a couple of years on the road shucking the Model 1897 for the big W.

Remington Arms Co. started their Hammerless Double Barrel Shotgun (aka Model 1894) serial numbers at 100000. When their Remington Hammer Double Barrel Shotgun (aka Model 1889) serial numbers reached 100000, they pretty quickly jumped to 200000 and kept going.
Share the knowledge
Post Reply