Had this for a few years.

NO ITEMS MAY BE POSTED FOR SALE ON THIS FORUM or direct references to items for sale. This includes, but is not limited to, the following: A personal item that’s obviously for sale or would appear to be for sale; or if a link is posted to some other site where the item is for sale. Please note that references to items posted elsewhere are ok for discussion as long as a direct link is not included. Any "Wanted to Buy" posts are not allowed and will be removed. The moderators will delete any posts that are deemed offensive, abusive or slanderous in nature. Commercial operations or businesses may not advertise nor appear to advertise their products or services, either directly, or indirectly by a second party, except for simple reference as a source for such products or services
Post Reply
Airborne
Posts: 3
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 5:16 pm

Had this for a few years.

Post by Airborne »

Received this shotgun after my grand mother died back in 1994. It belonged to my great grandfather.

I have no idea what it's worth or any details about it's grade or quality. I have been told it was a 1914 but the stamps would indicate 1905. I am very confused.

Any help would be appreciated.

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
SmithShady
Posts: 404
Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2011 1:01 am
Location: North Carolina
Has thanked: 11 times
Been thanked: 36 times

Re: Had this for a few years.

Post by SmithShady »

Hello Airborne,

You've got an early A Grade gun, which according to my book was manufactured in 1910 (based on the serial #). The A Grade is the lowest of the Graded Fox guns, with less engraving than you will find on the later A Grade Models. The Fox Collectors Main page has some pictures of the different grades if you're interested. http://www.foxcollectors.com/ah_fox/content/ae_fox.html With a serial # over 10,000 you should be able to request a factory card lookup on this gun, or get a Callahan letter which would tell you more about it's origins and original configuration. Overall a very nice looking gun!

Mike
"Games played with the ball, and others of that nature, are too violent for the body and stamp no character on the mind. Let your gun therefore be your constant companion of your walks." - Thomas Jefferson
Airborne
Posts: 3
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 5:16 pm

Re: Had this for a few years.

Post by Airborne »

Hey sweet. Thanks for the info. Shame it's an A grade. I was thinking about having it put back in firing condition but now I guess I just continue to use my modern shotty for goose hunting.
Twice Barrel

Re: Had this for a few years.

Post by Twice Barrel »

Airborne wrote:Hey sweet. Thanks for the info. Shame it's an A grade. I was thinking about having it put back in firing condition but now I guess I just continue to use my modern shotty for goose hunting.

No reason you can't use the A grade for waterfowl with the right loads. Contact New Era Ammunition or RST. I would recommend that you keep the load on the light side say less than 9,500 psi chamber pressure, 1200 fps muzzle velocity and 1 1/8th ounce of Tungsten Matrix or Bismuth shot. Unless they have been lengthened the chambers of you Fox A grade are most probably 2 5/8th inches so make sure you specify that the ammunition will be use in short chambers when you order.
eightbore
Posts: 3307
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 5:12 pm
Has thanked: 91 times
Been thanked: 441 times

Re: Had this for a few years.

Post by eightbore »

My "early A" #8833 is my project pigeon gun. I may not shoot many pigeons with it, but when I do, I will be shooting 1 1/4 ounce loads at about 1230 feet per second. I believe your gun is probably in firing condition.
Airborne
Posts: 3
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 5:16 pm

Re: Had this for a few years.

Post by Airborne »

eightbore wrote:My "early A" #8833 is my project pigeon gun. I may not shoot many pigeons with it, but when I do, I will be shooting 1 1/4 ounce loads at about 1230 feet per second. I believe your gun is probably in firing condition.
It's not, the safety is broken.

I have to get that fixed.
Post Reply