Jack O'Connor on chamber length

NO ITEMS MAY BE POSTED FOR SALE ON THIS FORUM or direct references to items for sale. This includes, but is not limited to, the following: A personal item that’s obviously for sale or would appear to be for sale; or if a link is posted to some other site where the item is for sale. Please note that references to items posted elsewhere are ok for discussion as long as a direct link is not included. Any "Wanted to Buy" posts are not allowed and will be removed. The moderators will delete any posts that are deemed offensive, abusive or slanderous in nature. Commercial operations or businesses may not advertise nor appear to advertise their products or services, either directly, or indirectly by a second party, except for simple reference as a source for such products or services
Post Reply
Northwester
Posts: 6
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2007 8:13 pm

Jack O'Connor on chamber length

Post by Northwester »

About a week ago I picked up an old book titled "The Shotgun Book" written by the Jack O'Connor. Jack was the gun editor for Outdoor Life for about four decades or so. The book was copyrighted in 1949, with additional printing in 1955, 57, 58, 1960, 61, 62, 64, 65. I purchased the 1965 edition. On page 90 of the 1965 edition Jack talks about chamber lengths of US made shotguns. I would like to quote what Jack wrote in reference to chamber length. "Chambers in American 12-gauge barrels were standardized at 2 3/4 inches right after World War I. The 16-gauge chamber were standardized at 2 3/4 inches in 1929, the 20-gauge chamber at 2 3/4 inches in 1926. A 3-inch chamber became standard for the .410 in the early 1930's when Western and Winchester brought out the 3-inch .410 shell and a gun to shoot it. The 28-gauge was standardized at 2 3/4 inches before the last war." What do people think about that paragraph?

Of course, adoption of a new industry standard takes time as the manufacturers must tool up for the pending change(s). Therefore I would think that there was some change control document / drawing which was pushed down from engineering to the production floor. We all know that chamber length wasn't mentioned in the 1920's and most of the 1930's catalogs, so it's not immediately apparent when Fox started to comply. But at the same time we still have production cards for many serial numbers. Therefore is it a stretch to believe that somebody out there might have some engineering change control documents about chamber lengths?
Researcher
Posts: 5733
Joined: Sun Jan 07, 2007 7:18 pm
Location: WA/AK
Has thanked: 291 times
Been thanked: 1515 times

Re: Jack O'Connor on chamber length

Post by Researcher »

Cactus Jack was a great writer, but not a great student of historical facts.
Share the knowledge
Post Reply