Double barrel fever (1st post)
Posted: Thu Mar 13, 2008 3:49 pm
Just recently joined the forum, but have been lurking around for quite a while. Participate on the doublegun BBS pretty reguarly and have been trading and selling off all my single barrel units in favor of the 2-barrel variety for the last 10 years. Once I owned/shot my first "Elmer Fudd" SxS, it was all over. I was hooked! Side by side fever hit me. It's official, I now break out in cold sweats if I don't at least get one out of the safe and fondle it every other day. I prefer to shoot something with feathers, but in the offseason, I have to be content with hugging and squeezing and cleaning these pieces of fine American craftsmanship.
Have bought mostly shooters over the years. .410's to 10g with several nice examples of each. Remington 1889, Parker VH, Aya 10g, Pre-war Stevens (when they were competing with the big boys), SKB, Browning etc. Nothing high dollar, but still near and dear to my heart. And yes I shoot them all. I have always said, that if the gun is too nice to carry in the field then it is too nice for me!
(I swear I really do have a Fox question) This week I finally found a Fox that was in my price range. So I made it mine. Early A-grade serial#108XX, 12b, 28" barrels M/I (ring true) and no pitting in or out, Barrels have spots with very little/no blueing, but no dents or dings. Rec. has traces of CC, but mostly shiny finish with standard early grade engraving. Wood is good with really nice checkering BUT someone has added a 1" piece of wood to the end of the buttstock to add about an inch to the LOP. This is what made the gun "in my price range". That's fine with me as I am going to use a laceup slip on pad to cover the extension and just make it a hunting gun fo me. My question is regarding the checkering. Right behind the receiver is a raised gold diamond in the middle of the checkering pattern. I've never seen this on any other guns pictured on this site or any that are for sale on the various sites. Does that mean the stock may not be original? Sure looks original and matching to my untrained eye. Is it worth restocking with a modern dimension stock since it's not a collector gun? Or put the lace up on it and see what I can hit? I only paid $400 for the gun so I could afford to re-blue the barrels and replace the wood and still not be up-side down in the gun. Opinions please and thank you in advance.
Have bought mostly shooters over the years. .410's to 10g with several nice examples of each. Remington 1889, Parker VH, Aya 10g, Pre-war Stevens (when they were competing with the big boys), SKB, Browning etc. Nothing high dollar, but still near and dear to my heart. And yes I shoot them all. I have always said, that if the gun is too nice to carry in the field then it is too nice for me!
(I swear I really do have a Fox question) This week I finally found a Fox that was in my price range. So I made it mine. Early A-grade serial#108XX, 12b, 28" barrels M/I (ring true) and no pitting in or out, Barrels have spots with very little/no blueing, but no dents or dings. Rec. has traces of CC, but mostly shiny finish with standard early grade engraving. Wood is good with really nice checkering BUT someone has added a 1" piece of wood to the end of the buttstock to add about an inch to the LOP. This is what made the gun "in my price range". That's fine with me as I am going to use a laceup slip on pad to cover the extension and just make it a hunting gun fo me. My question is regarding the checkering. Right behind the receiver is a raised gold diamond in the middle of the checkering pattern. I've never seen this on any other guns pictured on this site or any that are for sale on the various sites. Does that mean the stock may not be original? Sure looks original and matching to my untrained eye. Is it worth restocking with a modern dimension stock since it's not a collector gun? Or put the lace up on it and see what I can hit? I only paid $400 for the gun so I could afford to re-blue the barrels and replace the wood and still not be up-side down in the gun. Opinions please and thank you in advance.