About 6 months ago in Rochester, NY, I bought some West Coast magnum for $37. About 2 months ago I bought some Eagle magnum for $33. The Eagle supplier had Lawrence magnum for $37 and I passed. I would have passed were it $34.
FWIW, things that make you say hmmmmmm......
A few winters ago when shot prices took off I started stocking up 30-40 bags of Lawrence at a time until the price hit $26 and I quit buying. I managed to dodge the whole $40+ saga. But when my stash became low and I needed to buy again, I found Lawrence supplies spotty and Eagle invariably $2-3 bag cheaper. So I did some empirical hardness testing. While I stand by my methods, data and analysis it is afterall mostly one tiny sample taken from a single shell. It doesn't say anything about lot to lot variation or how things change year on year. However, I periodically retest the bagged stuff when I know it's from newer lots and nothing has shaken up the top 2 spots.
With respect to hardness alone, Eagle ranks at the top. Only slightly behind the gold standard, Lawrence magnum. And, like Lawrence, it is harder than the shot typically found in premium target loads. I can't speak to roundness, trueness to nominal size or uniformity of size but in the occasional patterning and shooting 30-40 bags per year I can't distinguish between Eagle, Lawrence and West Coast.
#7.5 shot / Relative Hardness
Lawrence Magnum Target ..........100 ( 4tests in 3 years)
Eagle Magnum .........................97 (4 tests)
Federal Premium Flyer..............95
West Coast Magnum .................94 (2 tests)
B&P F2 Mach ..........................92
Remington Nitro 27's.................91
Federal Gold Medal Paper...........91
Lawrence Magnum Copper..........87
Winchester SuperSport ..............84
Federal Premium Field Copper......77
Fiocchi Nickel Little Rhino...........74
Remington Nitro Express.............73
Winchester Black Diamond Nickel...70
Gamebore White Gold Nickel........68
Remington Game Load 16ga.........68
Fiocchi (Italy) HV Field...............68
I just found it very interesting that bagged shot available to reloaders is every bit as hard, and usually harder, than that found in premium factory ammo. That's not to say the factories use "soft" shot and nobody doubts their "premium" quality. It's more to say we reloaders don't give anything up in shot quality. As somebody who will likely never buy another box of factory ammo, that's comforting to know.
Also, for many years I've heard the conventional wisdom that "plated" shot is actually softer than magnum target grade. My testing affirms that for me. Compare the Lawrence Target & Copper, for instance. But in a recent magazine article titled "Shiny Shot" John M. Taylor asserts...
"The amount of antimony ranges from 1.5% in promotional loads to about 6% in the high-end target and premium loads, and it is these hard, high-antimony pellets that are plated."
I hope I'm not off base with my lengthy post, but I did stay on topic for the first sentence.
