Fox Collectors

I recently acquired a beautiful A grade serial 97XX or 91xx not sure if the second digit is a 1 or a 7 . Its in pretty good condition, however, should I choose in the future to get it restored I need some recommendations. I like the idea of a restoration to preserve and protect a guns mechanical and ascetic qualities to keep it in service as long as possible, however, there is something most pleasing about a fine shotgun showing its love marks and field ware. Though I've read several places that many British guns are frequently restored or at the very least maintained yearly so as to keep them in the best working order. Is it an American thing to fear restorations as they might devalue our beloved doubles? I saw the post of Doug Turnbull's work on another A grade and it looked mighty fine, however, I'd like to compare several different gunsmiths and see who has earned quality reputations before I'd ever make a decision. So the question is, who do you trust with your A H Fox. -Pinelander

I think most guys on this forum will agree that there's no hard and fast rule as to when to restore and when not to. Furthermore, I think in some cases, restoration work can enhance the value as well as the functionality of the gun, while other times not. It really depends on what you like and the current condition of your gun. I'm quite sure you'll get plenty of opinions if you post some pictures.

Interesting that you mentioned the British shotguns. I have heard that they often return their guns to the maker for cleaning, inspection, re-blacking of barrels, etc. I also read in Stephen Bodio's book "Good Guns Again" that one top shelf British gun-maker does not offer the hand detachable locks, as does Holland & Holland. When asked why so- the reply was: "Gentlemen do NOT open up their guns"--

That being said, I find the "working" grade doubles, sometimes known as a 'rainy day gun" to be more appealing, as most all are into their second or third ownership since they left the factory. Blue wear. fading case colors, a few slight scratches in the stock finish- all say to me: "I was made to be used- afield"

Another factor in your decision might follow along this train of thought. Assuming the gun fits you well, and you shoot it well, if you send it away to any of the fine restoration smiths, you are most likely to have a considerable wait before you get it back. Not just shipping time, but these craftsmen, like all true masters of their art, cannot be rushed, nor should they ever be. Point is- you lose the 'bonding time" with that gun while it is away. The indoors practice of the mount and swing that reflects your shooting style and ingrained habits. The chance to increase your skill with it on clays or pest bird targets.

I only have one AH Fox at present. A mid-1930's 20 gauge Sterlingworth with 28" barrels and double triggers, brush worn and well used, but locks up tightly and functions perfectly. I bought it from a former MI grouse and woodcock guide who hunted with it about 50 days each Fall season. To my mind, the 'wear with care" is a piece of his history and days afield passed on to me, whether I use it as much as he did, or not.

Okay, so here she is the serial number ended up being 97XX. Hope you guys enjoy. I sure do.

Unless there are issues with the gun, not shown in the photos, I would do nothing to the gun other than keep it cleaned & oiled.

Nice looking peach.

Mike

Me too.....it looks fine to me.

Unless there's hidden trouble we aint seeing leave it alone!!!....looks damn nice from here.

A very fine Vet. you have there. Leave it as is , nothing can improve on it .

In that condition I'd do nothing for sure. I'd say that is one no one would recommend for any restoration.

That is a fine looking early A.

Sounds like everyone is urging you to not do anything to it, including me. It looks great the way it is.

A real Classic that we're hoping will stay that way.

Due to popular demand, it will remain as is. Thank you for your input gentlemen.