Re: Sporting Clays
Posted: Tue Apr 25, 2017 9:24 am
For a congregation that loves history, here's a little history on the sporting clays gun mount....
Random thoughts on pre-mounting for sporting clays….
Par cours de chasse (governed by FITASC) is played in a multitude of countries on several continents. Everyone knows FITASC mandates a “ready position” with the gun touching the body lower than 25 cm from the top of the shoulder and the ready position must be maintained until the target is in sight.
“Sporting clays” is really only shot competitively in 3 countries…..all English speaking. Australian sporting is more similar to FITASC than to English sporting, but it does allow a “free mount,” meaning pre-mounted is acceptable.
In the USA we shoot the game of “English sporting clays ” (and FITASC, too, of course).
When Americans borrowed the game from England in the mid-80’s, they wanted to ensure that this new “simulated hunting” game did not get dummied down like skeet and trap had been. Never mind that international trap and skeet weren’t outlawed in the USA….they just weren’t popular. Guess what? FITASC, arguably the most difficult of all clay target sports, is not popular either.
Early on, the Americans decided that the “ready position” would consist of having the entire butt of the gun visible below the armpit and the gun could not be mounted until the target appeared…..similar to, but not identical to, FITASC. The problem was, this rule was neither fish nor fowl. Much more difficult to enforce than the FITASC rule with its visible line, and then as now, referees were scarce. Eventually, the pre-mount was allowed and thus began the urban legend……the wussy Americans had dummied down the game just like they had with skeet and trap. The rule was too tough to enforce and we wanted to make the game easier. You’re free to hold those opinions (I don’t) but the facts of how the free mount came to sporting clay are quite different.
In the early 90’s the NSCA finally emerged as the controlling body for registered sporting clays competition in the USA. About 1994 the rules committee, recognizing the difficulty of enforcing the low gun hold but determined to keep it, adopted the FITASC line for sporting clays. Problem was, that very next year the Brits were coming to the USA to compete in the World English Sporting Clays Championship. They were coming to shoot for the World title to THEIR game…..they invented it….and guess what? Those unruly colonials were attempting to bastardize it, because the Brits allowed the pre-mount! The low gun line rule was described in the NSCA rule book and rescinded before it ever went into effect.
URBAN LEGEND....the skeeters introduced the pre-mount to sporting clays. THE FACTS....the Brits owned the game, and they insisted on a "free mount."
As to the blanket statement that pre-mounting makes sporting clays easier, I say “hogwash.” If it were true, it would be the default in competition, as it is in all trap disciplines. But it is not. At least one national champion shoots predominantly pre-mounted, but it’s a rarity among the top shooters. Seems pretty straightforward that pre-mounting accomplishes one thing….it takes the mount out of the question. Therefore, it is an advantage on presentations where the most common mis-mount…failure to make or maintain firm cheek contact….is most likely to cause a high miss. For many that includes low, fast going away targets, as in trap-like presentations. I use the pre-mount, as one of a dozen different tools, on presentations where I’m likely to miss high, either as a result of too little cheek pressure or too much upward movement with the muzzle. In addition to trap targets, I pre-mount on most rabbit targets (tough for me not to peek) and low incomers with complex curling & dropping lines where it’s important to be only slightly in front but very critical to stay on the changing line. That may account for 25/100, or zero/300 depending on the courses I shoot.
Why the next fella’s pre-mounting bothers someone is a mystery to me…..it’s actually part of the “free-mount” rule, meaning do or don’t. If I think it’s an advantage….then I do it. If I don’t like it, then I don’t. If I'm not competing, how does he have an advantage? If something onerous to me is not mandated, why should I care? Complaining about something that has absolutely no impact on me is ….well….whining. No whining.
Random thoughts on pre-mounting for sporting clays….
Par cours de chasse (governed by FITASC) is played in a multitude of countries on several continents. Everyone knows FITASC mandates a “ready position” with the gun touching the body lower than 25 cm from the top of the shoulder and the ready position must be maintained until the target is in sight.
“Sporting clays” is really only shot competitively in 3 countries…..all English speaking. Australian sporting is more similar to FITASC than to English sporting, but it does allow a “free mount,” meaning pre-mounted is acceptable.
In the USA we shoot the game of “English sporting clays ” (and FITASC, too, of course).
When Americans borrowed the game from England in the mid-80’s, they wanted to ensure that this new “simulated hunting” game did not get dummied down like skeet and trap had been. Never mind that international trap and skeet weren’t outlawed in the USA….they just weren’t popular. Guess what? FITASC, arguably the most difficult of all clay target sports, is not popular either.
Early on, the Americans decided that the “ready position” would consist of having the entire butt of the gun visible below the armpit and the gun could not be mounted until the target appeared…..similar to, but not identical to, FITASC. The problem was, this rule was neither fish nor fowl. Much more difficult to enforce than the FITASC rule with its visible line, and then as now, referees were scarce. Eventually, the pre-mount was allowed and thus began the urban legend……the wussy Americans had dummied down the game just like they had with skeet and trap. The rule was too tough to enforce and we wanted to make the game easier. You’re free to hold those opinions (I don’t) but the facts of how the free mount came to sporting clay are quite different.
In the early 90’s the NSCA finally emerged as the controlling body for registered sporting clays competition in the USA. About 1994 the rules committee, recognizing the difficulty of enforcing the low gun hold but determined to keep it, adopted the FITASC line for sporting clays. Problem was, that very next year the Brits were coming to the USA to compete in the World English Sporting Clays Championship. They were coming to shoot for the World title to THEIR game…..they invented it….and guess what? Those unruly colonials were attempting to bastardize it, because the Brits allowed the pre-mount! The low gun line rule was described in the NSCA rule book and rescinded before it ever went into effect.
URBAN LEGEND....the skeeters introduced the pre-mount to sporting clays. THE FACTS....the Brits owned the game, and they insisted on a "free mount."
As to the blanket statement that pre-mounting makes sporting clays easier, I say “hogwash.” If it were true, it would be the default in competition, as it is in all trap disciplines. But it is not. At least one national champion shoots predominantly pre-mounted, but it’s a rarity among the top shooters. Seems pretty straightforward that pre-mounting accomplishes one thing….it takes the mount out of the question. Therefore, it is an advantage on presentations where the most common mis-mount…failure to make or maintain firm cheek contact….is most likely to cause a high miss. For many that includes low, fast going away targets, as in trap-like presentations. I use the pre-mount, as one of a dozen different tools, on presentations where I’m likely to miss high, either as a result of too little cheek pressure or too much upward movement with the muzzle. In addition to trap targets, I pre-mount on most rabbit targets (tough for me not to peek) and low incomers with complex curling & dropping lines where it’s important to be only slightly in front but very critical to stay on the changing line. That may account for 25/100, or zero/300 depending on the courses I shoot.
Why the next fella’s pre-mounting bothers someone is a mystery to me…..it’s actually part of the “free-mount” rule, meaning do or don’t. If I think it’s an advantage….then I do it. If I don’t like it, then I don’t. If I'm not competing, how does he have an advantage? If something onerous to me is not mandated, why should I care? Complaining about something that has absolutely no impact on me is ….well….whining. No whining.