Sterlingworth Chokes

NO ITEMS MAY BE POSTED FOR SALE ON THIS FORUM or direct references to items for sale. This includes, but is not limited to, the following: A personal item that’s obviously for sale or would appear to be for sale; or if a link is posted to some other site where the item is for sale. Please note that references to items posted elsewhere are ok for discussion as long as a direct link is not included. Any "Wanted to Buy" posts are not allowed and will be removed. The moderators will delete any posts that are deemed offensive, abusive or slanderous in nature. Commercial operations or businesses may not advertise nor appear to advertise their products or services, either directly, or indirectly by a second party, except for simple reference as a source for such products or services
Post Reply
sidelock
Posts: 3
Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2024 8:50 pm

Sterlingworth Chokes

Post by sidelock »

Did Sterlingwort come with reverse chokes like some British guns designed for driven grouse shooting ? I'm negotiating on a Philly. 20 gauge Sterlingworth with 30" barrels serial #2573** which would make it circa 1924 according to data. The dealer claims its all original and measured the barrels constrictions and claims the right barrel is F and the let is M. ?????? And did they come with different shaped fore-end for that time period ? This one has a blunter/bulkier fore-end than a traditional sliver but its defintely not a beavertail.
User avatar
fox-admin
Site Admin
Posts: 3813
Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2007 4:46 pm
Has thanked: 526 times
Been thanked: 1414 times

Re: Sterlingworth Chokes

Post by fox-admin »

Standard for a 30" 20ga was F/F but the factory would open chokes on Sterlingworth guns. The only way to know for sure is order a letter from Cody.
Researcher
Posts: 5828
Joined: Sun Jan 07, 2007 7:18 pm
Location: WA/AK
Has thanked: 313 times
Been thanked: 1644 times

Re: Sterlingworth Chokes

Post by Researcher »

While the Sterlingworth listings in the A.H. Fox Gun Co. catalogs from 1911 to 1929 all list 30-inch (Standard) guns to be bored full & full, three of the six letters I have in my files on 30-inch guns show modified & full. I have never seen one that letters with reverse chokes.

The Sterlingworth was an entry level gun built to standard specifications with very limited options. Any forearm other than these --
Flat-Top Checkering 02.jpg
Philadelphia style Sterlingworth Forearm.jpg
would be very suspect.
Share the knowledge
Foxnut
Posts: 1674
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 11:53 pm
Location: Western, MI
Has thanked: 810 times
Been thanked: 902 times

Re: Sterlingworth Chokes

Post by Foxnut »

From your description of the “blunt” forend it sounds like a Savage era forend vs. a Philly “sliver” forend. Again, this is only a guess from your description. Is the forend wood stamped w/serial number where the bottom rib channel is? Like Dave and Craig suggested only way to know for sure is to order Cody letter. As to the “reversed chokes would that work for your hunting situation/style. Can you become accustomed to using the rear trigger first for the more open choke should that be necessary? Best of luck and keep us posted. Brett
Regards - Foxnut
Stan Hillis
Posts: 2685
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 8:31 pm
Location: Jawja
Has thanked: 675 times
Been thanked: 791 times

Re: Sterlingworth Chokes

Post by Stan Hillis »

It has always been interesting to me that so many people promote double triggers as being the "ultimate choke selection method" while at the same time there is the issue of chokes being "reversed" on left and right barrels for "driven shooting".

If it is so easy to choose the rear trigger first for a far out incomer, like I do for incoming doves so often, why move the chokes around? Why not just go to the rear trigger first? I do this almost without thinking. I have shot S X Ss with the left barrel choked tighter than the right for so many years it is second nature. No fumbling, no bother. Front rigger first, rear trigger next. Or, rear trigger first, front trigger next. Go to a sporting clay range and practice it. It's not rocket science.

I think that sometimes as a doublegun fraternity we are guilty of the pot calling the kettle black.

No particular person in mind as I write this. I have just seen it so many times over the years.
Post Reply