Chamber wall thickness

Post your questions or seek advise regarding gunsmithing, restoration, repairs, ballistics, etc, etc.
Commercial operations or businesses may not advertise nor appear to advertise their products or services, either directly, or indirectly by a second party, except for simple reference as a source for such products or services
Post Reply
MC1952
Posts: 78
Joined: Fri May 15, 2020 8:15 pm
Location: Northern Virginia
Has thanked: 17 times
Been thanked: 91 times

Chamber wall thickness

Post by MC1952 »

My 20 ga Fox AE was originally chambered at 2 1/2”. I had the chamber wall measured and found it had been rechambered to 2 3/4”. The chamber wall thickness is .085. I’m assuming the original owner shot many 2 3/4” shells out of this gun but I’ve never shot anything but 2 1/2” RST’s.
What’s the consensus here on that? Is that too thin for modern 2 3/4” shells or should I just stick to RST’s?
Sporrns
Posts: 860
Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2013 5:22 pm
Has thanked: 90 times
Been thanked: 206 times

Re: Chamber wall thickness

Post by Sporrns »

Hello Mike - I just got finished measuring two nearly identical guns to yours, both A grades, one chambered at 2 3/4", the other at 2 3/8" in preparation for selling both. These guns are 630 SNs and 4 years apart in production (1917 vs. 1921). I have no way of knowing if the earlier gun with the 2 3/4" chambers has had them extended, but given the oft-quoted "standard" chamber length of smallbore guns of that era at the 2 3/8" dimension (for use with 2 1/2" shells), they probably were.

FWIW, the minimum barrel wall thickness as measured with a Hosford gauge for both guns is .030." The barrel wall thickness measured at a full 3" from the face of the barrels at the breech (e.g, at or beyond the beginning of the forcing cone) for the 2 3/4" gun is .085", while the measurement for the 2 3/8" chambered gun taken at the same distance is .110", which further indicates to me that the 2 3/4" gun probably had the chambers lengthened.

I've shot both guns; the 2 3/4" gun using standard target loads and the 2 3/8" gun using only RST 2 1/2" shells. As often said, I would be more concerned about damage to the stocks using more powerful ammo in the 2 3/4" gun or longer shells in the 2 3/8" gun. Hope this info is useful to you, Kevin
MC1952
Posts: 78
Joined: Fri May 15, 2020 8:15 pm
Location: Northern Virginia
Has thanked: 17 times
Been thanked: 91 times

Re: Chamber wall thickness

Post by MC1952 »

I’m not worried at all about the stock cracking. I had this one restocked. But I would like to shoot something less expensive than $20 a box RST’s.
IMG_2606.jpeg
Sporrns
Posts: 860
Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2013 5:22 pm
Has thanked: 90 times
Been thanked: 206 times

Re: Chamber wall thickness

Post by Sporrns »

Wally World Winchester or Federal 100-packs (4 boxes ea.) are now working out to c. $10 per box in either 12 or 20 gauge. Kevin
MC1952
Posts: 78
Joined: Fri May 15, 2020 8:15 pm
Location: Northern Virginia
Has thanked: 17 times
Been thanked: 91 times

Re: Chamber wall thickness

Post by MC1952 »

Sporrns wrote: Tue Mar 26, 2024 11:08 am Wally World Winchester or Federal 100-packs (4 boxes ea.) are now working out to c. $10 per box in either 12 or 20 gauge. Kevin
I’ve got 8 cases of 20 ga RST’s in 7 1/2 and 8 shot.
But I also have 15 cases of 20 ga 2 3/4” target loads that I’d rather be shooting up at targets.
So if everyone thinks .085 is safe I just might give them a try.
MC1952
Posts: 78
Joined: Fri May 15, 2020 8:15 pm
Location: Northern Virginia
Has thanked: 17 times
Been thanked: 91 times

Re: Chamber wall thickness

Post by MC1952 »

OK. I’ve still got all my fingers…
I took that old Fox to the clays course. I shot 25 rounds of RST’s and then shot 50 rounds of 2 3/4” target loads. No issues at all. Recoil seemed to be about the same and opening and ejection was fine.
I know that recoil isn’t an indicator of pressure but there didn’t seem to be much of a difference when shooting. I’ve got enough 2 1/2” RST’s for many years of hunting but I’m not worried any more about using modern target loads. I’ll stick with 7/8 ounce loads at no more than 1200-1250 velocity.
User avatar
Jeff S
Posts: 2733
Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2015 10:59 am
Location: Grand Rapids, Michigan
Has thanked: 1211 times
Been thanked: 723 times

Re: Chamber wall thickness

Post by Jeff S »

MC1952 wrote: Sat Mar 30, 2024 7:11 am OK. I’ve still got all my fingers…
I took that old Fox to the clays course. I shot 25 rounds of RST’s and then shot 50 rounds of 2 3/4” target loads. No issues at all. Recoil seemed to be about the same and opening and ejection was fine.
I know that recoil isn’t an indicator of pressure but there didn’t seem to be much of a difference when shooting. I’ve got enough 2 1/2” RST’s for many years of hunting but I’m not worried any more about using modern target loads. I’ll stick with 7/8 ounce loads at no more than 1200-1250 velocity.
I'm guessing that I have shot 4-5 cases of 2 3/4", 7/8 oz, 1200 velocity shells through my 20 ga. Sterly.
Stan Hillis
Posts: 2543
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 8:31 pm
Location: Jawja
Has thanked: 510 times
Been thanked: 616 times

Re: Chamber wall thickness

Post by Stan Hillis »

I sent my 20 ga. Philadelphia Fox SWE to Dean Harris and had him lengthen the chambers to 2 3/4”, like yours is, about 5 years ago. I spoke with him before sending it to him and we talked about wall thicknesses before and after the work. I use 1 oz. factory loads in it, at 1155 fps, because that’s what regulates the barrels. Lighter loads crossfire badly.

I have zero concerns about the loads I use in this gun.
Post Reply