Drawbolt Sterlingworth on GunBroker

NO ITEMS MAY BE POSTED FOR SALE ON THIS FORUM or direct references to items for sale. This includes, but is not limited to, the following: A personal item that’s obviously for sale or would appear to be for sale; or if a link is posted to some other site where the item is for sale. Please note that references to items posted elsewhere are ok for discussion as long as a direct link is not included. Any "Wanted to Buy" posts are not allowed and will be removed. The moderators will delete any posts that are deemed offensive, abusive or slanderous in nature. Commercial operations or businesses may not advertise nor appear to advertise their products or services, either directly, or indirectly by a second party, except for simple reference as a source for such products or services
Post Reply
Jack71
Posts: 22
Joined: Mon Jul 03, 2017 7:15 am
Has thanked: 12 times
Been thanked: 14 times

Drawbolt Sterlingworth on GunBroker

Post by Jack71 »

Drawbolt Sterlingworths are supposed to be rare, but I've seen several for sale over the past 12 months (For more info on these guns, see Frank Srebro's article in the Winter 2014 Double Gun Journal). There is one for sale on GunBroker (serial #143437) with a low starting price, but the LOP is only 13 3/8", so I'm not interested. The seller also thinks the barrels may have been cut, they measure 27 15/16". While I don't know if it is true of Sterlingworths, some double gun barrels can very slightly from the standard lengths of 26, 28, 30, etc.
Researcher
Posts: 5794
Joined: Sun Jan 07, 2007 7:18 pm
Location: WA/AK
Has thanked: 305 times
Been thanked: 1599 times

Re: Drawbolt Sterlingworth on GunBroker

Post by Researcher »

I have found the drawbolt Fox-Sterlingworths in three serial number blocks. Those in the 133xxx range are 30-inch, those in the 143xxx range mostly 28-inch with a couple of 30-inch and those in the 161xxx range are 26-inch. I'd think 27 15/16-inch is close enough to 28-inch for Savage work. Just looking at the pictures the LoP looks a lot longer than the stated 13 3/8-inch.
Share the knowledge
Jack71
Posts: 22
Joined: Mon Jul 03, 2017 7:15 am
Has thanked: 12 times
Been thanked: 14 times

Re: Drawbolt Sterlingworth on GunBroker

Post by Jack71 »

Now there is another drawbolt Sterlingworth for sale on GunBroker, this one is #143641. 28" barrels. The head of the stock is cracked and that's a dealbreaker for me.

I also saw #133897 for sale yesterday at the Richmond, VA gun show. Also a drawbolt gun, but I thought the price was too high for its condition.

My point in this post is I have heard estimates that less than 200 of these guns were made by Savage, but I keep seeing them offered for sale. While there is no way to know the actual number manufactured, I suspect it is larger than 200.
Researcher
Posts: 5794
Joined: Sun Jan 07, 2007 7:18 pm
Location: WA/AK
Has thanked: 305 times
Been thanked: 1599 times

Re: Drawbolt Sterlingworth on GunBroker

Post by Researcher »

The serial number spreads I've recorded would indicate there could well be a couple thousand.
Share the knowledge
Sporrns
Posts: 909
Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2013 5:22 pm
Has thanked: 166 times
Been thanked: 320 times

Re: Drawbolt Sterlingworth on GunBroker

Post by Sporrns »

My tendency would be to go with Researcher's number(s) - I wonder how many people have picked them up and examined them at guns show without ever knowing what they were before AHFCA documentation, McIntosh's book, etc. As I recall there was one for sale recently at the NE SxS at Hidden Hollow in early June. Kevin
Researcher
Posts: 5794
Joined: Sun Jan 07, 2007 7:18 pm
Location: WA/AK
Has thanked: 305 times
Been thanked: 1599 times

Re: Drawbolt Sterlingworth on GunBroker

Post by Researcher »

In Frank's great draw-bolt article in The Double Gun Journal, Volume Twenty-Five, Issue 4, it states on page 135 and 137, that a review was done of production cards from 132454 to 133924. Of the 1471 frame numbers the 1468 surviving cards all but 133814 are Sterlingworth TRAP cards but the TRAP is crossed out and the cards are stamped 30. 133814 is a BRUSH card with the BRUSH crossed out and 30 inscribed. Frank states "But the Drawbolts are random along with regular Sterlys and a few flat-sides in that range, and they can't be identified and counted." My observations don't support that. All the thirteen guns I've recorded from 132649 to 132927 are flat-sides and the eleven guns I've recorded from 133022 to 133897 are all Drawbolts. The guns I've recorded in the 1324xx and 1325xx range are regular frame Fox-Sterlingworths.
Share the knowledge
MARSHFELLOW
Posts: 1664
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 2:07 pm
Location: Adirondack Mountain foothills
Has thanked: 93 times
Been thanked: 165 times

Re: Drawbolt Sterlingworth on GunBroker

Post by MARSHFELLOW »

Jack,
PM sent
IN GOD WE TRUST. SPE Skeet & Uplands and AH Fox vent rib guns a specialty
User avatar
Silvers
Posts: 4795
Joined: Sat Jan 06, 2007 9:28 pm
Location: Between Phila and Utica
Has thanked: 857 times
Been thanked: 1224 times

Re: Drawbolt Sterlingworth on GunBroker

Post by Silvers »

Researcher wrote: Sun Jul 10, 2022 10:19 pm In Frank's great draw-bolt article in The Double Gun Journal, Volume Twenty-Five, Issue 4, it states on page 135 and 137, that a review was done of production cards from 132454 to 133924. Of the 1471 frame numbers the 1468 surviving cards all but 133814 are Sterlingworth TRAP cards but the TRAP is crossed out and the cards are stamped 30. 133814 is a BRUSH card with the BRUSH crossed out and 30 inscribed. Frank states "But the Drawbolts are random along with regular Sterlys and a few flat-sides in that range, and they can't be identified and counted." My observations don't support that. All the thirteen guns I've recorded from 132649 to 132927 are flat-sides and the eleven guns I've recorded from 133022 to 133897 are all Drawbolts. The guns I've recorded in the 1324xx and 1325xx range are regular frame Fox-Sterlingworths.
Dave is a careful observer and I greatly respect his opinion that there may be more than what was the accepted number of "about 200" Drawbolt Foxes when I wrote that DGJ manuscript in early 2014. I also stated on page 135 that: despite extensive study I don't have a better number than that.

Likewise I have great respect for the work of John Callahan who was the Savage/Fox Historian at that time. I commissioned John (that means I paid him) for extra work to review the factory Record Cards nearby serial no 133567 which was to be the featured Drawbolt gun in my DGJ piece. In two Reports to me dated May 31 and July 18, 2013, John related that he looked over 1470 numbers from serial nos 132454 to 133924 and while 133567 and some very few others were missing, that entire range was recorded on Trap cards with Trap crossed out, and that: all were identical with 30" barrels that effectively made them: "Sterlingworth Standards". In other words, none were identified as Drawbolts. John wrote that was in 1939 and surmised: it was some sort of clean-up operation. I didn't ask John about Flat Sides nor did I address them in that article.

It sounds like Dave has a compilation of 13 + 11 = 24 examples, and that integrates with the range of 1470 numbers that were reviewed by John who said they all were Sterlingworth Standards ..... no breakdown of Drawbolt, Flat Side or regular Frame 12-gauge Sterlingworths. Net, unless I'm missing something here, everything lines up and there doesn't seem to be anything else to support or deny.

I'm reminded of a piece that Jack O'Connor once wrote; it was titled something like "Picking Your Expert". :)

frank
Aan
Researcher
Posts: 5794
Joined: Sun Jan 07, 2007 7:18 pm
Location: WA/AK
Has thanked: 305 times
Been thanked: 1599 times

Re: Drawbolt Sterlingworth on GunBroker

Post by Researcher »

We all owe Frank a vote of thanks for commissioning that study. I was just attempting to state what I've found. I have found no regular frame Fox Sterlingworths within the runs of flat-sides and draw-bolts that I've recorded. I can't say they don't exist, but I've yet to see one. I started recording Sterlingworths in 1989 at the suggestion of McIntosh.
Share the knowledge
Post Reply