Newbie Sterlingworth Serial ?

NO ITEMS MAY BE POSTED FOR SALE ON THIS FORUM or direct references to items for sale. This includes, but is not limited to, the following: A personal item that’s obviously for sale or would appear to be for sale; or if a link is posted to some other site where the item is for sale. Please note that references to items posted elsewhere are ok for discussion as long as a direct link is not included. Any "Wanted to Buy" posts are not allowed and will be removed. The moderators will delete any posts that are deemed offensive, abusive or slanderous in nature. Commercial operations or businesses may not advertise nor appear to advertise their products or services, either directly, or indirectly by a second party, except for simple reference as a source for such products or services
Post Reply
ErikT
Posts: 14
Joined: Fri Nov 28, 2008 5:13 pm
Location: South Central PA

Newbie Sterlingworth Serial ?

Post by ErikT »

Help me determine the age of my new gun. I just aquired a Sterlingworth non-pin gun. 16 ga. 28" bbls weighs 5lb 12.5 oz.
Serial # 3504##
There are no other significant markings.

This number preceeds any numbers on the serial # list on the gunshop.com link! Any clues would be appreciated.


Thanks!!!
Hunt Much?
User avatar
Silvers
Posts: 4766
Joined: Sat Jan 06, 2007 9:28 pm
Location: Between Phila and Utica
Has thanked: 837 times
Been thanked: 1185 times

Post by Silvers »

Number shown in the doublegunshop list for Fox is the estimated LAST gun made that year. Yours is one of the first 16 gauge SW's made ~1912-13. Numbers for 16 Sterlingworths started at 350,000. All smallbore Foxes had hinge pins that were dressed smooth, they were never made in the so-called Pin Gun configuration. Silvers
Aan
ErikT
Posts: 14
Joined: Fri Nov 28, 2008 5:13 pm
Location: South Central PA

Post by ErikT »

Very cool. Thanks for pointing that out.
This gun handles like a dream! Nice lop and moderate drop. It comes up smooth!
Hunt Much?
User avatar
spyder
Posts: 432
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 1:08 pm
Location: Middle Tennessee
Has thanked: 35 times
Been thanked: 67 times

Post by spyder »

I have 3509xx. I understand it was made in 1913, but I'm thinking about getting a Callahan letter.
ErikT
Posts: 14
Joined: Fri Nov 28, 2008 5:13 pm
Location: South Central PA

Post by ErikT »

spyder wrote:I have 3509xx. I understand it was made in 1913, but I'm thinking about getting a Callahan letter.
What is a Callahan letter?
Hunt Much?
Researcher
Posts: 5750
Joined: Sun Jan 07, 2007 7:18 pm
Location: WA/AK
Has thanked: 301 times
Been thanked: 1543 times

Post by Researcher »

Share the knowledge
mc15426378
Posts: 739
Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2008 11:23 pm
Location: Mississippi

Post by mc15426378 »

Erik, does the dressed screw end at the rear of the safety stick out past the area around it? If it does then it may be in too far. Take a look at the
disassembly procedures on the Home page. Then look at # 4 in the list for how to correct. Very simple if this is the cause. Hope this helps.

Mike
ErikT
Posts: 14
Joined: Fri Nov 28, 2008 5:13 pm
Location: South Central PA

Post by ErikT »

mc15426378 wrote:Erik, does the dressed screw end at the rear of the safety stick out past the area around it? If it does then it may be in too far. Take a look at the
disassembly procedures on the Home page. Then look at # 4 in the list for how to correct. Very simple if this is the cause. Hope this helps.

Mike
Mike,

No, the screw does not protrude, in fact it is well below the surface of the top tang. I'm not sure what the problem is becase the slide functions well with the exception of requiring excessive force to move :x
I guess the only way to investigate will be to dissassemble the action.
Hunt Much?
User avatar
Silvers
Posts: 4766
Joined: Sat Jan 06, 2007 9:28 pm
Location: Between Phila and Utica
Has thanked: 837 times
Been thanked: 1185 times

Post by Silvers »

I must have missed something here - PM's between the two of you? In any case the rear tang screw must be tight, possibly the most important thing you can do on an old Fox. Otherwise you chance splitting the stock under recoil. If the shank protrudes from the tang after tightening - and that bothers you - dress it down even with the tang and have its end re-engraved to match the original design. Good to take a macro picture first to show the engraver what to do. If the safety slide is hard to move its internal parts may be rubbing on the stock, rusty or whatever. If you take the gun apart it should be obvious what's up. Silvers
Twice Barrel

Post by Twice Barrel »

Before you start tearing into stuff put a small drop of synthetic lubricant such as Breakfree in the space between the safety button and the top tang and work the safety back and forth a few times. A bit of lubrication can work wonders.
ErikT
Posts: 14
Joined: Fri Nov 28, 2008 5:13 pm
Location: South Central PA

Post by ErikT »

Silvers wrote:I must have missed something here - PM's between the two of you? In any case the rear tang screw must be tight, possibly the most important thing you can do on an old Fox. Otherwise you chance splitting the stock under recoil. If the shank protrudes from the tang after tightening - and that bothers you - dress it down even with the tang and have its end re-engraved to match the original design. Good to take a macro picture first to show the engraver what to do. If the safety slide is hard to move its internal parts may be rubbing on the stock, rusty or whatever. If you take the gun apart it should be obvious what's up. Silvers
Sorry for late reply- No, No PM's. what you see is what we discussed. I think its rubbing on the stock or corroded in some way although it does not feel sticky or sketchy when operated.
Hunt Much?
Post Reply